Or: How to get a leg up in the world of sleazy, gangsta’ politics.

After an absolute trainwreck administration – certainly the worst government administration in the history of the United States, with the highest inflation levels in 40 years, a botched, horrific withdrawl from Afghanistan which caused the deaths of thousands of servicemen and women, significant responsibility and participation in armed conflicts in both Ukraine and the Middle East, 31 million illegal alliens crossing the border (and being permitted to vote – but it didn’t work!!), hundreds of thousands of illegal alien children gone missing, certainly involved in sex, organ and slave trafficking, hostile activity and bullying of Nato allies (think bombing of Northstream II, EU vaccine mandates as well as ‘green’ policies which are destroying our European economies)- Democrat elites choose to throw Joe Biden under the bus, forcing him out of running as an incumbent, picking his uniquely incompetent running mate instead, in what has correctly been entitled a coup. Just a few short monthes prior to the presidential election, members of the democrat caucus were forced to accept a sudden change of candidate after universally rallying around the senile Joe Biden, and instead were obliged by economic and military neocon elites to accept the imposition of a Kamala Harris candidacy.

Now if your memory is slightly longer than the news cycle, you will recall that in the runup of the Democrat primaries for the 2020 election, Kamala Harris was generally depised by all, garnering less than 2% of the vote, and she was the first of all the presidential candidates running in that election to be eliminated. Recall also that she was eventually chosen – not for her outstanding merits, but rather for her immutable characteristics: that is, for the the fact that she is female and of colour -characteristics which the Left chooses to take into consideration only when it is of any benefit to them: otherwise, like Supreme Court Judge Katanye Jackson (also chosen by Democrats because of her sex and skin colour), Leftists claim they cannot define what a woman actually is. (see article Katanje’I am not a biologist’ Jackson).

Kamala seems to have taken on numerous identities over the corse of her life: from child of upper – middle class university professors in Oakland, California, to child of a single mother in Montreal, Canada (although a significant portion of her childhood and young adulthood was spent in Canada, she makes no mention of that, which as a Canadian, I resent).

She returned to the US as an adult, studied at Howard Unversity, became an attorney, then a prosecutor, registered to vote at age 29 at the same time she became the mistress of Willie Brown, the then mayor of San Francisco (this was probably the moment she was encouraged by Brown to enter the political arena). It is a curious fact that she began voting so late, considering that she claims to have been a child political activist, yet she did not excercise the most basic form of US citizenship activism, which is excercising the franchise through casting a ballot.

Kamala became a lawyer at UC Hastings, but did not pass the bar the first time she took it. She made it through her second attempt, then got a job as a prosecutor in Alomeda County, eventually specializing in child sex crimes, trying EIGHT CASES IN EIGHT YEARS, which if you havn’t understood, is a paltry, negligible amount of cases.

When she ran for district attorney in 2003, she lied, claiming that she had tried HUNDREDS of cases. The truth is that she tried 2 cases in San Francisco during her period of work in the DA’s office, before quitting and running against her boss, and 8 in Alomeda county. She also held 2 high paying jobs as a prosecutor, whilst working very little. Terence Hallinan, her boss, who was a progressive prosecutor, recruited Harris, hiring her our of Alomeda county as a favour to the mayor of San Francisco, Willie Brown, providing her with a chance to participate in the big leagues.

This opportunity provided her with the responsibility of heading the five person Criminal Organizations unit, but she was passed over for the role of Chief of Staff – which is number 2 position in the DA’s office – on two occasions, and this was clearly the position in which she was actually interested.

Willie (wily) Brown

Willie Brown, mayor of San Francisco, speaker of the Assembly, was probably the most powerful machine politician in Democrat politics in all of California, and this is the man whom Kamala ‘dated’ (she was his mistress) for years, despite the fact that he was married. Brown and John Burton essentially ran San Francisco, and to win an election in that town, their stamp of approval was necessary, making them the most formidable block in the city, and somewhat of a mob entity. Obviously, the fastest way to rise in politics in this environment is to be tied to the coattails of individuals like Willie Brown.

Kamala slept with Willie Brown, accompanied him everywhere, and it is undisputed that he gave her her start in politics. it was suggested tht she develop relationships, and a power base, in the African American community, for which reason she became friends with the notorious black pastor and activist Amus Brown, and promoted a line of political activism which would be hard on some crime, but not disproportionatly against black Americans (foreshadowing future ‘Equity- not equality’ DEI stances).

When she was passed over the second time for the second- most significant position in the DA’s office (probably because Terence Hallinan understood she was gunning for his job), she quit, moving over to the City Attorney’s offices – a breeding ground for excellent judges and attornies- putting together a portfolio of child welfare, juvenile offenders, and other softball subjects which would, however, provider her with discussion material, should she run for office.

All of these fluffy, high-paying, undemanding activities at which Harris barely worked, were all footed by the taxpayer. Kamala never had a job in the private sector, and has been living on taxpayer money her entire career. At times, on paper, she was even doing multiple jobs. You see, one of the privileges you have as a speaker, is to appoint people to patronage jobs, so before Willie Brown left the position of speaker, he was able to appoint her to one of two commissions. She was therefore on a publicly funded commission called the Unemployment Appeals Board, where you hear appeals of denials of unemployment benefits. It is a comfortable, part-time job which pays 100,000 dollars to show up a couple of days per month. He also got her appointed to a second job which required only a couple of days per month, called the Medi-cal assistance commission, dealing with Medi-Cal contracts and appeals. So during the years that she was recieving a salary – firstly in Alomeda county and then in San Francisco, she earned an additional + 400,000 dollars over a five year period, with these significantly undemanding part-time jobs. Brown also bought her a BMW.

To put things in persective: a prosecutor at that time earned about 100,000, but Kamala was earning three times as much as her collegues, because she was sleeping with the mayor. This did nothing for morale in the office, but marked her out as privileged in her thirities, allowing her to leap over – or get a leg up, if you will – the normal hurdles which others with greater integrity earn and have earned with talent, diligence and hard work.

It is undeniable that the significant male patronage and the extra earnings from that period have made her the person she is today, especially considering the sleaziness and corruption of the one-party system in the state of California. Hence the rewarding not of merit, but influence peddling and using her female wiles.

Kamala and Willie eventually parted ways, because she understood that he would never leave his wife. Yet they remained partners and collaborators, and he was instrumental in assisting her to raise huge amounts of money, campaigning for her and eventually helping her to win the election. Now we are speaking about a man with a over 60 year history of significant corruption, and obviously the election of Kamala to the position of DA was no exception. Her opponent Terrence Hallinan was left wing, but with a reputation for being tough on crime and corruption, going so far as to bringing charges against the police chief of the SFPD in particular scandals.

Willie Brown was not particularly happy with the above scenario, as he had arranged SF in such a manner, that everyone in the Punblic administration owed it to him in some way, and he as such was able to ‘get things done’, as both a lobbyist and a ‘fixer’. In particular, elected officials and law enforcement tended to turn a blind eye to his significant activity in the San Francisco real estate industry.

Terrence Hallinan was getting deep into the investigative weeds surrounding this San Francisco power structure, and it was making WB uncomfortable, and by replacing Hallinan, though the agency of Kamala Harris, Willie Brown was able to put an end to these investigations.

Through Willie Brown’s assistance, Kamala Harris frequented Democrat elite establishment events and aquired the support of the wealthiest and most powerful establishment families, such as the Getty family, and in exchange, she – as his former mistress – ensured that all investigations against Brown were dropped. This smooth sailing for both Brown and Harris continued for many years, until she became attourney general.

So is her name pronounced KA – ma – la, or Ka-MA-la?

KAmala, is the correct Sanskrit pronunciation, and it is a name which signifies ‘lotus’, reserved for the Brahmin caste, of which her mother is a part. (So yes: she’s hardly oppressed!) Yet she, on the other hand pronounces her name quite often with the accent on the second syllable. Often, but not ALWAYS, which is simply bizzarre, much like her alterations in accent according to where she is speaking publically. Was this because she had chosen to “focus” on the ‘African American’ community early on in her career, identifying with that small percentage of blackness in her DNA? Who knows. At any rate, she is on the books as pronouncing her first name at least three or four different ways. Clearly, she is a shapeshifter with a talent for pandering to individual groups, adopting and abandoning personae on a dime, in an ‘authentically fake way’.

Kamala has been very self-righteous about her professional record, claiming to be a top-cop, a border cop, and in law enforcement and tough on crime, but she actually began her career by breaking the law, on multiple occasions:

In 2000, Willie Brown asked her to take a leave of absence from her position at the City attorney’s office, and do some work for Amus Brown, a notorious pastor, who was campaigning for a position on the board of Supervisors. He was supposedly representing the African American community, and was one of Willie Brown’s ‘people’. She was to assist him during his campaign, but instead of volunteering, she was paid as a political consultant for Amus Brown’s campaign, despite having no political experience. She never registered under city law, which requires that all political consultants paid more than 1000 dollars on a campaign be registered. She was paid about 10,000 dollars, never registered, was called out on this, and pretended that she had not been aware of this law. (ahem, you are a LAWYER). This was the beginning of Kamala’s long history of giving a middle finger to the law.

She got herself embroiled in a much bigger scandal when she ran for DA.

in San Francisco, there is matching of campaign finances, but there is also a benefit that you get if you willingly agree to cap your campaign spending, which at the time of this election in 2003, was 211,000 dollars. Such a publically declared limit functions thus: you recieve a statement, published in the voter guide which is mailed to more than 500,000 registered voters in San Francisco, stating that you had voluntarily agreed to confine yourself to the specified spending gap, making the election a level paying field, but also a significant indicator that you are not willing to engage in corruption, excessive spending and cronyism, as well as the reception of money from unknown sources.

Harris agreed to this, signing a paper – on penalty of perjury – stating: ‘I Kamala Harris agree to this voluntary spending limit’. Most of the candidates in that race – including the candidates running for mayor -also agreed to that spending limit.

It turns out that Kamala, who started out in this particular race third, with first place going to her boss, Terrence Hallinan, and second to Vic Fazio, former prosecutor and defence attorney with a ‘hard-on-crime’ position which was endorsed by the Republicans. Because of her underdog position, she decided to really super-charge her spending, and Willie Brown came to assist her, helping to raise money for independant expenditures to support her as well. Interestingly, one of her themes at that time was that she was going to be tough on drugs, and in particular marijuanah, leading a marijuanah activist to investigate her expenditures. Turns out that, pouring over her campaign expenditures, this activist discovered that she had raised over 300,000 dollars, and spent more than 300,000 dollars. Therefore, this person went to the other candidates, and they filed an ethics compaint against her, because at the end of the election she had spent more than 600,000 dollars: more than 3 times the amount to which she had agreed to limit herself!

In the end, by hiring a good lawyer, and lying, claiming that the forms had changed and she hadn’t understood, the Ethics Commission – most of whom owed their positions to, guess who! Willie Brown – waived the complaint! This gross violation – which is a crime, by the way – should have led to her being prosecuted for a misdemeanor, had she been held properly accountable for this significant campaign finance violation. Anybody else would have been prosecuted, but the ethics commission simply lifted the cap.

So instead of disqualifying her -which would have been the normal punishment – Kamala simply went ahead, untouched and unpunished. Therefore, in her first race for elected office, she ignored the campaign finance limits, she used corrupt patronage from her former lover to raise the money necessary to do glossy ads, she did more mailers than all of the other candidates, she had independent expenditures on her behalf, and she simply was able to outspend and blow through agreed limits.

Incredibly, she won.

She got into the runoff and then was able to win in the runoff against her boss. Her expensive, illegal campaign paid off, and her meteoric career was launched by the world’s oldest profession, combined with campaign finance violations and generalized corrupt activities (including the solliciting of tens of thousands of dollars from slum landlords, whose tenants she was theoretically charged with protecting).

So, Kamala blew through those campaign finance limits, and yet she was given a complete pass if she issued corrective apology, as well as disclosure to the public, which she did by distributing a door hanger, upon which was written in miniscule type, was written.

“Due to an error by the Kamala Harris campaign, the voter information pamphlet indicates that the campaign has agreed to voluntarily limit campaign spending. This is incorrect. We take responsibility for this error”.

Now this is printed on the top of this hanger hanging on the door handle, so there’s no way the normal wage slave coming home from their actual job where they worked a full day – unlike KamalaHarris, aka people who are not dating Willie Brown, or rather, we taxpayers who have private sector jobs – you come home and the first thing you do with this annoying piece of crap is actually more likely that we will rip it off the doorhandle, directly where the small-print apology is written.

After getting her start in politics by breaking the rules, accumulating taxpayer money in no-show jobs by having- if possible – the lowest attendance record of any attendee of her two commissions, she continued – according to public records we requested – to work negligent hours; professional behaviour for which any other attorney would be put on probation. She did actually claim in a subsequent election that she had tried hundreds of serioius fellony cases, when in fact she had tried ten.

Corporate Media Covering for Kamala’s Gaffes

The television programme 60 Minutes was caught substituting a completely incoherent answer that Kamala gave in response to a challenging question, with a completely different response she had given in another part of the interview, or perhaps it was even taped afterwards. 60 Minutes was then caught lying about their modification of the original interview, and the fact that they had attempted to hide her incoherence from the public.

This seems to have been a theme throughout her career dating back to that 2002-2003 election, during which she got her leg up in life by shortcuts, not by meritocracy, and then found herself in a position that is beyond her capabilities, necessitating the lies, manipualtion and the necessity of exaggerating in order to maintain that position and get get to the next level. Fortunately, with the election results being confirmedin favour of Donald Trump, we no longer have to be terrified by the thought of incompetant, word-salad Kamala in charge of the most powerful military in the world.

To be fair, Kamala Harris is just one in a long line of corrupt, underqualified and overconfident sleazy California politicians, but this person was seeking the top job of the United States, with an exaggerated record, a tattered history of sordid techniques for achieving her promotions, and legal violations that could have resulted in criminal prosecution, just for the campaign finance violations alone.

Kamala Protecting Criminals

Kamala was elected because she promised that she was going to be tough on crime, but during her years as district attorney, the murder rate skyrocketed. She was notoriously hard on gun possession by legal taxpayers, yet criminals and gangs knew that if you were caught drunk driving, you were going to get a pass during Harris’s tenure (in Alomeda county, or Sano county, or Marin county, you would be prosecuted).

Criminals, being extremely intelligent, and maintaining excellent communication, knew they could go to San Francisco to do their drug dealing, their break-ins, their hot prowl burglaries, their low-level offences, because Harris was actually extremely lenient – to the point of allowing multiple criminals with guns in their possession to go scott -free with a slap on the wrist – and several of them went on to commit murders after she let them off. There was this preposterous double standard during her prosecution period and tendentially a theme throughout the State.

ANARCHO-TYRANNY

This seems to be what the socialist elites really want, and Kamala Harris has been reenforcing this objective by rendering San Francisco a sanctuary city (aka. chaotic hellhole), turning a blind eye to gun possession amongst illegal aliens whilst rendering it almost impossible for a decent, taxpaying citizen to possess a firearm.

Harris and her cronies have been protecting these folks at the cost of American lives and livelihoods by simply looking the other way, and inventing ways in which to persecute the innocent (think covid). So how is that not treason and insurrection??!! How is it not insurrection to allow foreigners into your state against federal law, permitting them to carry firearms to use potentially against law abiding citizens? How is it not treason to enact treaties, policies and mandates imposed by extra-national entities?

When Harris was district attorney, a criminal illegal immigrant for whom she had pushed to be in a job rehabilitation program to avoid prison time, committed a more serious, heinous crime, shattering the skull of a San Francisco tax payer. The problem – besides the fractured skull – was that the program was designed for American citizens, not for illegal aliens, and therefore Harris had used taxpayer money to sponsor an illegal alien who was not even eligible for such a program, who then went on to do serious bodily harm to an American. We’ve observed this in our own European countries, and the question begs to be asked: how is this not recognized as insurrection?

Leftists are clearly trying to overthrow our societies: they commence with their desire to legalize illegal aliens, to the point of making it a campaign promise, with the objective of obtaining their votes, making them the insurrectionists who wish to overthrow the present reality of the United states (and Europe) as we know them. and not only are Leftists in general and Kamala Harris in particular insurrectionists: they are criminals. she in particular has broken not only numerous white-collar laws; she has also enabled thousands of criminals to commit violent crimes and even fatalities, including the lives of numerous San Francisco police officers.

It’s truely mysterious and amazing: there is a trail of dead bodies leading to Kamala Harris’s incompetency and her soft-on-crime policies, but she’s lied about it and gotten away with it. It is truely incredible, considering that on her watch, the murder rates increased by many percentage points, that she prosecuted almost no violent crimes in San Francisco during the many years she was a district attorney, that she failed upwards to becoming the Attorney General where she went on to violate the rights of criminal defendants on a much more massive scale. One of the interesting incidences is in the last two years of her tenure as district attorney, was that she was embroiled in a major scandal involving the systematic violation of criminal defendants rights. In San Francisco, as well, a drug technician who was supposed to test the drugs, was taking them home and sampling them and also making numerous errors. This was an Open Secret and huge scandal in the district attorney’s office.

And we havn’t even reached Kamala’s record as attorney general! That will have to wait for another day.

Kamala’s Hatred for the Pro-Life Movement, Free Speech

Kamala has a particular hostility towards pro-lifers, prosecuting individuals such as Dave Delon for infiltrating the abortion industry, Planned Parenthood and the National Abortion Federation, and documenting the sale of foetal body tissue and organs, and systematic violation of federal law. And don’t forget her shameful performance during the Kavanaugh hearings. What a despicable, shrewish, ignorant, prejudiced modus operandi. I look back and shudder.

But because Planned Parenthood donates millions to Democrat Campaigns, and ladies: Run for the Cure donates a million dollars to female Democrat candidates who support abortion, abortion causes breast cancer, so what a horrific 360° to keep both Big Pharma and the abortion industry in business – Planned Parenthood encharged their disciple Kamala to prosecute this journalist with such explosive material, ignoring the First Amendment right to free speech, citizen journalism and the fact that all recordings made by the undercover journalist were registered in public places and therefore licit.

This was 7 years ago, and Dave Delon’s case is still pending, being passed from judge to judge, because noone has the attributes to contest Kamala and her abortion industry affiliates, yet they have no desire to emprison a journalist, wich would be a violation of free speech. Paradoxically, Delon faces years of prison time if he is convicted, but none of the companies selling aborted baby body parts has been held accountable for violating the law. This is representative of a corrupt, infiltrated legal system which punishes the innocent and requests no accoutability of actual criminals.

Kamala and her cronies want to suppress any informed opinions which are in contrast to the elite’s running narrative. She would have been the useful tool of that oligarchy which desires to censor freespeech and the free flow of information online. They want to make it illegal to criticize the wrong doings of government officials, which would be facilitated by the implementation of digital ID platforms such as the ones used in the CCP, because a fresh, objective view of their wrongdoing might lead to their demise. They also want to implement a concept of Hate Speech, which of course does not exist, because such a notion is relative to the perspective of the individual, making it a crime. Yet just recall that the mainstream media, which is owned by Blackrock and funded by Big Pharma, Big Agro, Bill Gates, the military industrial complex, has gotten everything wrong, purposefully, obviously. They and the WHO (owned by Gates) want to make it illegal to publish CORRECT DATA online, if it goes against the government narrative! Hopefully, hopefully, we will be less at risk of a complete suspension of our democratic rights, with Donald Trump as Commander – in.- Chief.

Who Is Kamala’s Husband Doug Emhoff?

Recall the false testimony of Christine Blaisey Ford during the Kavanaugh hearings, and how Harris and others ‘feminists’ had their day, delving viciously into the private life of perhaps one of the most morally righteous men in the United States. Yet regarding testimony of misconduct and violence of her own husband, Kamala remains silent.

Kamala married a lawyer named Doug Emmhoff, who came of age at the same time as Kamala, in the Law Firm Venables (there is no sleazier group), with a big partner in Los Angeles. It was an environment where powerful men exploited less powerful women for their sexual gratification, cheated on their wives, and if you wanted to become partner at some big law firms, you had to sleep with a partner to do it. Even those women who accused their harassers recieved no closure and the accused went on to become partners at powerful law firms.

Doug Emmhof had been married to a Hollywood executive prior to his marriage with Kamala, had a couple of kids, and they divorced but seem to remain on good terms, with his law firm actually representing her in some administrative litigations.

Harris, on the other hand, was the very public mistress of Willie Brown, then dated Phil Bronstein (owner of San Francisco Chronicle), before going on to marry this powerful lawyer. In fact, it seems she has only ever dated extremely powerful men, the significance of which is the emergence of an ambitious, outdated, anti-feminist technique of climbing the rungs of power with feminine wiles, to further her own interests. Emhoff in particular had access to Hollywood millions, which really assisted her in getting funding for her Senate fundraising.

In recent weeks, a story has emerged of a woman claiming that Emhoff struck her in public at the Cannes Film Festival so violently that she spun around. This was immediatly reported to multiple sources, which in law is considered an excited utterance; that is: if you inform someone of something horrible that happened to you in the immediate seconds and minutes after the event, it is assigned a higher degree of credibility under hearsay law than otherwise.

Concurrently, at the time of the slap, Emhoff had been accused of getting a nanny pregnant, then causing her a miscarriage through an act of violence.

Because this man is the husband of the VP and (now former) presidential candidate, Americans have a right to know whether or not this individual has a propensity for domestic violence. Who would want such a man in the White House? And this, after the media has touted this bigoted and sanctimonious little prick as the ‘new face of masculinity’, and after the MeToo movement – of which Kamala is a part – has vocally called for ‘believing all women’ (even Christine Blaisely Ford).

Doug Emhoff, by the way, has also reportedly been accustomed to having his paralegal secretaries sit on his desk, among other things, with the implication being that this man clearly treats women as objects, not as equals. It is frightening to consider that the US risked a President who is most likely a victim of domestic abuse, or at least – an enabler.

The irony is that so many women will have voted for Kamala because she is a woman, but she and her administration have done so much to harm women, through the abolition of title 9 as it was previously known, through the horrific sex trafficking across the Biden-Harris open border, through the abandonment of Afghan women into the hands of the Taliban, through the forced mandates of an experimental MrnA injection causing female sterility, miscarriages and agressive cancers. But most importantly, she represented for so many women the possibility of equal opportunity under the law for all women to be able to access even the most important job in the world, based upon meritocracy. But where is the merit in this profile description?