“Free, OBBLIGATORY daycare.” E. Letta, Secretary of Italian PD Fabian Socialist EliteParty.

“Free and easy access to daycare.” G.Meloni, Secretary of Fdi Centre-‘Right’ Socialist Party.

Cui bono?

“Give me your four-year olds, and in a generation I will build you a Socialist State”. Leftist demiurge, V.Lenin

Today’s mothers are trapped: between modern society’s pressure to adhere to new societal norms which dictate that women behave as men, occupying their position in the work force full -time and regardless of the presence of any children (almost always concieved well beyond normal child-bearing age); the urgent necessity – thanks to rising inflation – of contributing to the family income; their righteous desire to maintain their careers; and their equally strong desire to enjoy their babies and give them the best possible care.

Child psychologist and reserarcher John Bowlby, captured the essence of sensitive parenting in the title of his book: A Secure Base. “The primary goal of parenting”, he wrote, ” is to provide a child with a lifelong sense of security- a secure base from which he can explore the world, and to which he can return , knowing he will be welcomed, nourished, comforted and reassured.”

Bowlby argued that the child’s ability to establish intimate emotional bonds throughout life will depend upon the strength and the quality of his attachment to his parents. He stated that the integrity and cohesiveness of this bond will influence, in large measure, that individual’s mental health and effective functioning throughout life.

BONDING AND ATTACHEMENT

Bowlby explained the mother-child relationship in terms of “attachment theory“. For human babies, the bonding which results in secure emotional attachment begins at birth. Both bonding and attachment are dependant upon continuous, sustained, stable and physial and emotional contact between mother and child.

When a child is confident that his mother is available, responsive and helpful, he develops a pattern of secure attachment. When a child is chronically uncertain about his parents’ responses to him, he will develop a pattern of anxious – resistant attachment. This parent is sometimes helpful sometimes, not, sometimes there, sometimes, not. Such inconsistency produces anxous and clinging behaviour in the child. Finally, the child whose needs are rarely met and who has little confidence his parents will respond to his call, develops a pattern of anxious avoidant attachment. As he grow older, he may expect to be rebuffed, and often tries to live without seeking love and support from others. These forms of behaviour common amongst children from dysfunctional and/or abusive families, are frequent amongst full-time daycare wards, much to the dismay of their parents and caregivers.

Psychiatrist and Psycologist Vamik Volkan identified the capacities of several different kinds of intimacy that develop during early maternal-infant interaction: the capacity for bodily intimacy, for intellectual intimacy and for social intimacy.

Volkan noted that the infant’s thoughts, feelings and knowledge are undifferentiated at birth. Over the first weeks, monthes and years of life, these become more integrated. The role of mothering is crucial. The stable and continueous presence of mother is vital for the child’s developing cohesion, integration and differentiation – not only in infancy and toddlerhood, but throughout childhood.

Earlier is not better: especially in the case of boys, whose need for physical movement exceeds that of girls, and is fundamental for their neurological development; homechooling is superior in every way, providing us with many of the world’s most brilliant historical figures, geniuses, entrepreneurs, and scholars; babies and small children, whose immune systems are in a developmental and therefore compromised phase, should not be exposed to the scope and quantity of infectious diseases present in daycare facilities; homeschoolers score higher in lieracy than their peers; American children – most of whom do not frequent kindergarten – have the highest literacy rates in the world at the commencement of their scholastic careers. These rates rapidly fall in accordance to the number of years spent in the faulty american public schools system.

“The Hand which Rocks the Cradle Rules the World”. William Ross Wallace

Daycare is not good for women, nor does it assist them in any way in the management of their families. It certainly does not encourage them to have more children, as the cost of maintaining the Welfare State creates a vicous cycle of inflation, taxation and the necessity for more hours in the workforce. It also demeans the noblest calling of all, to Motherhood: the raising of the future generation, which requires pain, suffering, sacrifice, passion, love, creativity and intelligence, but which no one could possibly hope to replicate. It is so very fundamental, that without it, our culture and society are literally being rent apart at the seams, and only strong and courageous women can reverse this collective suicide. It is time to stand up and denounce the lies of so-called feminists, who are nothing more than reverse mysoginists, ridiculing and demeaning women unless they accept to be couterfeit imitations of men. Their greatest lie of all, was that it would be possible to have it all, and at any time a woman chooses. I would replicate: You may have it all, if you so choose, but not all at the same time. (If you so choose, because along the way, women discover another feminist lie: working outside of the home is NOT more gratifying than caring for your own children!) A woman should have her children when she is young, when she has the energy, and dedicate her time later in life to pursuing her career.

Costs of State-run Childcare

As is apparent form the copious body of research on the subject, a child’s healthy development relies initially exclusively on the the mother, and in early childhood, upon the constant reliable presence of at least one of the following: mother, father or grandparent, or stable family figure. Let us now look at the costs for State-run daycare, in order to dispel once and for all the myth of ‘quality, affordable childcare’.

Let us look at Italy, where birthrates are at a record low (below replacement rate), and where salaries are amongst the lowest in the EU, following well-established guidelines for optimal teacher:student ratios.

Population:

0-2 years : 807.503

2 years: 424.329

3-6 years: 1.391.400

Teacher: Student Ratios:

0-2 years, 3:1, or 269,168 teachers

2 years: 4:1; or 106,082 teachers

3-6 years: 8:1, or 173.925 teachers.

Therefore, 549.175 teachers, at 1,800 Euro per month plus 40% taxes = 2,500 month incurred per teacher by the State, equals a monthly total cost to the State of 1,372,137,500 Euro. Annually, this would cost the State 17.889.787.500 Euro., and at the cost of providing care for babies and children vastly inferior to that which is provided by the mother and her extended family.

Solutions

“Every child born today will produce seven times more wealth than it presently consumes.” Superabundance, Marian Tupy

-Eliminate the cost of the Reddito di cittadinanza introduced in 2019, which costs the State roughly 40 billion Euro annually, creating a Reddito di cittadinanza for every italian child, until he/she finishes school. (1.000 euro per month, income tax free per child, to assist the mother to stay at home with her children, continuing until the child finishes school. If the mother returns full-time to the workforce, the 1000 Euro per child will be interrupted, although after her fourth child, no woman will pay income tax, ever.)

-In the case of the impossibility of the mother to remain at home with her child, or if the mother is still attending university, the same amount could be provided to a retired grandparent or trusted family member, when legally registered as the fulltime caregiver of the child. It may not be used for daycare.

-This would cost the State 31.478.784.000 Euro, saving roughly 8.5 billion Euro, but would be a resolution to unemployment, as women would remain with their children, freeing up placement into full and part-time work for unemployed men and students, as well as assisting the extended family by providing remuneration for the precious work that grandparents perform in caring for their grandchildren.

-Provide significant tax deductions for parents, permitting them to occupy lower income brackets and therefore pay fewer taxes.

-Money remaining from the original sum spent on RdC may be spent on courses in order to assist women in remaining updated on any innovations within their workplaces, as well as investment in community programs and activities for small children, to permit safe, limited socialization.

Rebecca de Broglie Vannicelli

Goodbye, Mozzarella di Bufala

Over 140,000 Mediterranean Buffalos have been put down by order of the Italian Ministry of Health, after the discovery of a small percentage of positive cases of Brucellosis/Tuberculosis amongst Campana herds. Autopsies reveal that fewer than two percent of the animals put down resulted as positive for the infections: an indication that the order to suppress the lives of these animals is in direct contradiction of existing Italian and European laws prohibiting the killing of entire herds if the rate of infection is beneath 20%.

Previous vaccination campaigns had all but eliminated these infections from Italian buffalo herds, whose precious ‘white gold’ bears fruit to the music of 1,298,000,000 Euro annually, but in recent years of technical governments, have witnessed the removal of herd vaccinations, making it necessary to return to age-old practices of eliminating entire herds when the situation becomes unmanagable.

The most bizarre fact of this recent episode in which there were fewer than 2% of the animals infected, is that the selfsame day these poor creatures were slaughtered, they were placed on the market as bovine meat for public consumption, after the carcasses had been sold almost exclusively to the industrial group Cremonini.

The end result of this recent crusade of Minister ‘Robespierre’ Speranza, promulgated by pandemic psychosis and executed by the Campania president Vincenzo De Luca? 140,000 healthy buffalo specimens killed, 300 businesses gone bankrupt, an average increase 0f 18% of the aforementioned infections amongst the remaining herds, caused by diagnostic delays of the Asl veterinary institutes, and the mass diffusion of false Mozzarella di Bufala.

The 9th of June, Doctor Giuseppe Barbero, cardiologist at the Roman Hospital Umberto I, will have to appear before the Italian Order of Doctors, for simply doing his due medical diligence. This doctor – also professor – prescribed medical exams for his patients who were at risk of thrombosis, to ascertain whether or not the Cov19 inoculation may have potentially placed them at even greater risk, and in several cases, was able to establish elevated risk and hence exemption from the inoculation. The end result of his scrupulous efforts to protect his patients: being dragged before a disciplinary committee of the Italian Order of Doctors.

This is yet another of the countless cases of punitive actions being taken against doctors who applied in a rigorous manner the deontological code of their profession, acting in the name of the principle of precaution, which is part and parcel of good clinical practice.  The application of this principle, in this case is considered – incredibly – a violation of the same deontological code, which actually reads (article 48): that the doctor has the duty to inform his patient regarding the risks involved with the use of an experimental drug (or vaccine). According to the Order of Doctors of Rome, Doctor Barbero was not supposed to inform his patients of the risks connected to the vaccination, and therefore he was not supposed to protect them from possible adverse effects. The guidelines which are still in use, on the other hand, recommend the anti-covid inoculation to everyone, with only a few, rare exceptions (like Robespierre Speranza, the Minister of Health himself); guidelines serving as a coercive shield which this unelected technical government has expropriated from Italian citizens, even the adolescents, by means of blackmail in the form of the useless and destructive greenpass.

In the words of Doctor Giuseppe Barbero: “ It is a politicization of the medical deontological code, since the Order of Doctors would prefer that the medical act be in function of the memorandum circulating throughout the Ministry. . . I hope that the Order regain its sense of conscience in considering the figure of the medical doctor as a free and independent professional whose sole scope is the care and respect of human life”.

Instead of the carrot and the stick, Robespierre Speranza prefers funding for Psychologists and Masking

Ignoring rising summer temperatures and the hundreds upon hundreds of scientific and medical articles regarding the uselessness and harm of masking, Robespierre Speranza still insists upon forcing the face diaper upon school students – even for their final graduation oral exams – stating laconically that students should consider themselves fortunate that they have not been forced to do return to online schooling (DAD in Italy: distance didactical education). How dare he invoke the spectre of DAD, for absolutely no reason?

On the other hand, and clearly without even the minimum sense of irony, Speranza has established a so-called ‘psychological bonus’ worth ten million Euro in funding, which may be utilized by those with annual earnings of up to 50,000 Euro (the working poor, residents of the South of Italy, who are notorious for not paying taxes, and residents of Downtown Milan, who declare to the tax collector that they own nothing: in fact, all money, property and vehicles at their disposal are registered to their companies). A penny more, and you are destined to pay the expense of your psychologist from your own pocket, and so once again, as with every other bonus, it is the middleclass who foots the bill for everyone.  

At this point, what good could speaking with a psychologist possible do? What could this unelected Fabian do to repair the damage done by the decisions of his own Ministry and the unelected government to which he belongs? Everywhere, there is only the rubble of the psychological war which this malignant cancer of an unelected government has waged against the italian populus. The development of babies and small children has been all but halted, with an average decrease of over 20 I.Q. for babies born during the plandemic. The Children’s Hospital Bambin Gesu registered an incrementation of over 300% of psychotic episodes of self-harm and attempted suicide amongst young people. Families were not permit to unite, to mourn, to bury their deceased members, to bring closure to their pain and suffering. Entire populations were bombarded day and night with fear porn, and blocked from attending Church, from breathing fresh air, walking in nature, socializing with friends and peers, attending cultural events. Inoculation propaganda created a false dichotomy analogous to that of the propaganda waged against Jews in Poland in the late 1930’s:  vaccinated=good, clean, cooperative, pro-science vs unvaccinated=dirty, bad, evil, corrupt, ignorant, creating a rift which will be almost impossible to heal, if not with super-human amounts of Christian forgiveness.

Illegal Immigrants enjoy cruiseship holiday in Italy, courtesy of Italian taxpayers

The use of the ingenious quarantine cruiseships dreamed up by one of our more recent, unelected technical governments (together with school desks on wheels, and scooters on the freeway) is now being used to house illegal immigrants to the music of millions. Between January and March of this year, our dreamteam unelected government spent over twenty million Euro of taxpayers’ money (yes, because the EU gives us peanuts  – no, empty peanut shells – for this  problem) on cruiseships alone, contracted for hosting illegal immigrants.

Technically, this flow of money should have ended at the end of the much-discussed Health Emergency; there is no quarantine for unvaccinated Ukrainians arriving from outside of Italy: all that is expected is a nose swab within 48 hours of arrival, and other foreigners are not requested to do any testing at all. And therefore we can conclude that the original quarantine cruiseships are being used as extremely expensive, additional centers for hosting illegal migrants, regardless of the fact that there are no existing laws or decree stabilizing that these vessels be used for such a purpose.

Considering the millions of Euro this costs the Italian taxpayer monthly, we believe this would be the moment – not just to send Luciana Lamorgese home – but also to establish the criteria for the construction of an acceptable structure of shelter and protection for those migrants truly in need. There will be a predictable augmentation of the number of illegal migrants due to food shortages caused by the Ukraine conflict , and it would be appropriate to have plans and structures in place to respond to these potential increases in individuals requesting asylum.

News this week in the Roman Catholic Church

Nancy Pelosi has been barred from reception of the sacrament of Holy Communion due to her very public stance on and promotion of abortion. Archbishop Cordileone’s imposition has received a firestorm of criticism, but since Pelosi swore to bring about the codification of the controversial sentence Roe vs Wade, which would essentially provide unfettered access to abortion at all stages of pregnancy for any reason, the archbishop and canon lawyer has taken it upon himself to clarify the position of the Catholic Church, in order to prevent further confusion and scandal. After sending letters to Pelosi, Archbishop Cordileone launched the Rosery and roses for Nancy initiative. The Archbishop has been accused of politicizing the sacrament, but he has stated to be exclusively moved by his pastoral mission, as well as Pope Francis’s underlying support of the revised book 6 of the Code of Canon Law (canon 1379), in which the importance of moving the erring Catholic to the point of conversion is treated in detail, and underlined as the responsibility of the pastor. It is also sound Catholic doctrine and an act of mercy to refuse communion to one who is publicly recognized as being in a state of grave sin, both to protect that individual’s soul from eternal condemnation, and the Church from greater scandal. Nancy Pelosi has since flagrantly disregarded the imposition of her Archbishop, which could signify that she is now ipso facto outside of the Church (she has, by her actions, excommunicated herself).  

One must be in a state of grace to receive Holy Communion: 1 Corinthians 11:23-26:

“Therefore whoever eats this bread or drinks this cup
of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty of the body and blood
of the Lord. But let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of the
bread and drink of the cup. For he who eats and drinks in an unworthy
manner eats and drinks judgment to himself, not discerning the Lord’s
body.”

Cardinal Zen’s trial in Hong Kong

On Tuesday, the former bishop of Hong Kong,  Joseph cardinal Zen appeared in a Hong Kong court and faced new charges. He was originally arrested on charges of conspiracy to collude, which under new security laws, carries potentially a life sentence. He faced trial together with 4 other former trustees of this relief fund, who, upon appearing in court, were charged with failing to register the fund with police as a ‘society’; a misdemeanor which may incur a fine of up to 1200 Us dollars for the first conviction. Cardinal Zen plead not guilty. The second charge is not a change, but rather an addition to original charges, but cardinal Zen will face the more serious security charges later this year. He will return to court in September for the fine, and there may very well be a life sentence for the graver charge. The situation is a concocted effort to intimidate the Catholic Church and Chinese Christians at large. In fact, Cardinal Zen’s arrest really symbolizes the end of religious freedom in Hong Kong. The arrest is a warning that no one will be exempt from arrest – not even a 90-year-old emeritus bishop – if they fail to conform to the ideology of the CCP.

Following his trial, Cardinal Zen offered a Mass (May 24^th, feast of Mary, Help of All Christians) in commemoration and honor of all those Christians who are not able to offer or attend Mass. This also coincided with the Day of Prayer for the Church in China. Speaking with the circa three hundred people at the Mass, Cardinal Zen spoke critically of the Vatican- China deal, which he suspects may very well represent the death of the underground Church.

Although Cardinal Zen is perhaps the most well-known Chinese Catholic dissident on the world stage, and despite the fact that he is the only Catholic cardinal on political trial anywhere in the world, the Vatican  – and more specifically, Pope Francis –  failed to mention his name on the day of Prayer for the Chinese Church, nor are they offering him any legal assistance. Parolin apparently believes that ‘dialogue’ with the CCP takes priority over the life of an elderly Chinese cardinal.

Pope Francis stated earlier this week that Americans don’t have deep roots in North America: “You are a people of migrants, of Irish immigrants and Italian immigrants. The Irish brought you whisky, and the Italians brought you the Mafia. Always look at the roots”.  Some are reacting with hostility to those comments, with one journalist calling it a series of ethnic slurs.

Italy

EudraVigilance, the system created for the reporting of adverse effects which is controlled by EMA, the European Agency for Medecines, has officially reported 1,276,056 adverse events, and 10,630 deaths directly related to the Cov19 inocculation for all of Europe. These numbers – despite being high – represent between 1 and 10% of ACTUAL adverse events and deaths, for a plethora of reasons: firstly, from the onset of the inoculation campaigns, there has been no active pharmacovigilance, as would be expected BY ITALIAN AND EUROPEAN LAW for a Type-3 Clinical trial, secondly because those cases which are reported to doctors, vaccine hubs and cardiology units of hospitals are not included in these counts BY OFFICIAL INSTRUCTION, thirdly, because the criteria for direct attribution of the effects to the inoculation established by the WHO are purposefully restrictive to the point of absurdity, fourthly, and most importantly, because more than 80% of EudraVigilance’s funding derives from pharmaceutical companies

The Italian Progressive Globalist Leftist Socialist elite is in a huff after one of its Progressivist darlings, judge Vladimiro Zagrebelsky, simply noted that in a Democratic society, it is not acceptable to force one’s opposition into silence, as his political faction is wont to do, considering that it owns all of the newspapers except one, as well as all of the radio channels and television programs. The Feme-Fascist factions are swooning and calling for their smelling salts, after Zagrebelsky’s statement that “Instead of proposing counter-arguments, they (the Left) want to silence those who think differently. But you may not silence those who are against abortion.” “Criticism of laws is obviously our free right, just as it is also our right to forward proposals for their modifications, either in a restrictive sense or in order to widen their applications. And not only that: the direct propaganda against the possibilities of usage which the law permits, is also our right”. . . . “Regardless of one’s position on abortion, in defense of the freedom of opinion and expression, one can only hope that we will not witness an act of censorship on the part of public authorities” (with regards to advertisements for the ProLife group ProvitaeFamiglia).

For the more than 4,000 Italian doctors who have refused the infamous inoculation, not only are they being suspended professionally without the possibility of working and collecting their monthly paychecks: their professional insurance policies have been removed (effective retroactively), which is the equivalent of removing their one fundamental protection, considering the number of lawsuits continuously filed against them.

During their suspension period, these doctors will not receive any form of remuneration. This is their ‘punishment’ for being found guilty of personally visiting all of their covid patients and curing all of them at home, by the thousands. No hospitalizations. No deaths. How dare they? These doctors have been replaced with Ukrainian doctors who do not speak the language, do not have the necessary medical training (few countries can compete with Italy’s medical excellence), and have not been inoculated with the magic serum.

The Southern coast of Italy (Sicily, the island of Lampedusa, and now Calabria) is under constant assault by illegal immigrants arriving from the North Coast of Africa. Institutions for hosting these individuals are overwhelmed by the sheer number of illegals arriving every day, and whilst the mayors of the towns and cities in these areas are requesting a direct intervention of the Minister of Interior Affairs, Luciana Lamorgese, it is highly unlikely that measures will be taken to send back boats while still in international waters. The EU – whilst obliging Italy to harbour these illegals – has only ever provided circa one twentieth of the actual cost of hosting these illegal aliens, annually.

The EU is also attempting to force Italy – under the guise of fair competition laws – to accept the ceding of its coasts to Multinationals. In an eight minute hearing with his Ministers, unelected premier “the Liquidator of Italian Assets” Draghi, stated that if the decree regarding Fair Competition were not approved, the PNRR European financial assistance would no longer be accessible. Draghi’s Ministers promptly obeyed, but they did not take into account that there may be thousands upon thousands of ‘little people’ whose families have established a customer base and superior product over the course of generations, but who would not be financially capable of taking on the competition of any Multinationals with their unlimited financial resources. If there are still a handful of morally uncorrupted judges in Italy, justice may very well be on the side of these family businesses now allied in a front against the onslaught of the Globalist elites. There are already a few favorable sentences suspending the pronouncements of the Council of State regarding the outcome of the renewal of these balneological licenses.

Italy, now Europe’s third greatest power, exported 16% of its products exclusively to Russia in the year 2021. Ulterior sanctions against Russia are crippling the sectors of clothing, chemicals and machinery. At a moment in which the country is struggling to recuperate some level of equilibrium post-covid restrictions, Italy cannot afford to proceed with sanctions against Russia. Add to these financial losses the fact that the cost of energy for Italian companies has risen on average 500% since March of 2022, and we have a recipe for industrial and economic stagnation.

While the use of masks in closed spaces has been all but eliminated, the Italian Ministry of Education insists upon their usage in schools because of their ‘educational value’. There is no scientific evidence in favour of the use of surgical masks in preventing the spread of covid19, or any other infection, for that matter (please see January article, which is a compilation of over 400 medical and scientific articles regarding not just the inefficacy, but also the harmful effects of mask usage). Therefore, the obligation was imposed on school children without any appropriate analysis of risks/benefits, and it further interfers with interpersonal relations and early childhood development. According to Minister Bianchi (another unelected representative, pal of aforementioned Draghi), masks have “educational value”: indeed they educate towards compliance, blind, unquestioning obedience, scientific illiteracy, and the effectiveness of fear porn.

World events and the information regarding them, are accelerating at a precipitous speed. Let’s take a look at all that has occurred n the past 7 days, commencing with the US:

USA:

Because the Radicals in the Biden administration are devastating the US – and the rest of the world – with their insane, idiotic policies, they take advantage of any diversion to distract the populace and gin up more racial hostilities. In Buffalo, NY, Pres. Biden took advantage of the occasion of public mourning to smear conservatives as white supremacists, to attack the Republican Party and prominent Fox News Hosts, to state that online conservative platforms should be censured, to prevent people from being ‘radicalized to violence’. He even went so far as to make the outrageous statement that there is a direct correlation between the Buffalo shootings and the people attending the January 6^th rally. It is difficult to feel pity for a tottering, confused Joe Biden when apparently, he still has no shame, daring to draw a comparison between a mid-Western dad sipping a Coors light in the Capital rotunda, and a mass shooting which left ten people dead. He is still a liar, lying as he breathes, and it is still his defining characteristic (recall that he was expulsed from the 1988 elections for lying and plagiarism, as well as doctoring his academic record).

Speaking of silencing Conservatives: Carl Cameron of MSNBC (Microsoft) is calling for the jailing of conservative journalists, because – according to him – Republicans have become the purveyors of misinformation. Which is a closed case of the Left projecting their behaviour, in the classical Alinsky sense. Leftist accusations are actual confessions.

In response to the claim that Republicans are purveyors of mis-information, one should ask: which party claims that: babies are not babies, boys are actually girls, lopping off little boys’ genitals is an act of gender ‘affirmation’, Donald Trump colluded with the Russians, Covid did not originate from the Wuhan covid laboratories, there are no medicinal cures for Covid, vaccines are totally safe and effective and will prevent you from contracting the virus or transmitting the virus, two weeks to slow the spread, believe all women, I can’t define woman, men can give birth, the 2016 election was stolen, there was no election fraud during the 202 election, etc. etc.? Their lies go on and on.

Thankfully, the Ministry of Truth – I mean, the Government Disinformation Board – that Biden set up to punish his domestic political opponents, has apparently been put on pause because of . . . disinformation (It was halted because Conservatives spotlighted it and would not allow themselves to be silenced). Three weeks after the announcement of its inception, working groups have been suspended. The woman who was supposed to lead the group, Nina Jankovitz – yes, that peddler of disinformation regarding Russian collusion and other lies that we’ve been force-fed for the past several years – has resigned, but rest assured that the DHS intends to proceed with the work of censuring us.

Shall we demonstrate how manipulated our public square has become? Prior to purchasing Twitter, Elon Musk requested proof of Twitter’s claim that fewer than 5% of its accounts are bots. Their CEOs originally refused, but after some insistence, it has been established that more than 20% of Twitter accounts are false, and that over 50 % of followers of the official Scotus account are fake! Not only is this fraudulent and manipulative: it is also terrible for business.

Leftists and Progressives have been accusing Republicans of spreading a conspiracy theory entitled “The great replacement Theory”, which is none other than the Left’s project to replace the original American population with illegal immigrants, and permitting them to vote (Law HR1).  The Left presumes that its quickly eroding electoral base will be substituted by illegals, who will vote for them, presumably out of gratitude. This is analogous to the conspiratorial machinations of the Globalist Progressive faction here in Italy,  represented by the PD party, which is desperately pushing for the passage of the law Ius Soli/and or Ius Cultura, which would give illegal immigrants immediate citizenship: a preposterous idea, considering the extremely high population density of Italy, and the fact that it – of all super Powers (twenty years ago, Italy was an economic power house which rated 3^rd amongst world exporters) Italy has been hardest hit by adherence to the Euro and the EU.

So, on one hand, the Globalist Left is now claiming that this theory is bizarre and absurd, whilst on the other it states that such a phenomenon has been going on for ages and it is a good thing, that it is merely the ‘American Way’. The Left does not call it replacement, but rather ‘renewal’. Renewal of the progressive base, perhaps, but a guaranteed recipe for economic stagnation and collapse.

The above argument is fruit of yet another contemporary phenomenon, which is: the Left gets to make a statement, usually in an attempt to push the Overton Window. Conservatives then hold up a mirror to the Left’s has statements, at which point the Left becomes infuriatedat Conservatives for  exposing their delusionist blather . Holding a spotlight up to the preposterous statements of the Left is considered ‘Hate Speech’.  We as a populace are being forced to lie, to deny what we see, to negate what we hear, whilst all the while the left smirks and contradicts itself and brags and boasts, because they have stolen the power.

“Critical race theory is not being taught in schools, but it’s great that it is”; “Transgenderism is not being pushed on little kids, and it’s great that it is”; “replacement is not happening, but it is great that it is”. Is it any wonder that it is not possible to trust any of the Establishment media? They hold the truth to be contemptible.

One piece of the Democrat narrative which has completely collapsed under the weight of reality: Trump hammered Biden during the 2020 election debates regarding the fact that the Biden name made millions, selling influence in both Ukraine and China: that is, millions were made by Hunter Biden, who has absolutely no credentials, whilst 10% went to Biden himself. If you recall, Biden negated this fact during the 2020 debates. But thanks to Hunter Biden’s tendency to damage his laptops, we now know that Hunter Biden earned over 6 million dollars in China alone, by selling access to his father. We also know many things about Hunter that we would prefer not to know.

Moral theologian Whoopi Goldberg sounded off on The View regarding Bishop Cordileone’s formal refusal of the Holy Eucharist to pro-choice House Speaker Nancy Pelosi : “The Archbishop of San Francisco is calling for the speaker Nancy Pelosi to be denied receiving communion because of her pro-choice stance. He’s one of the priests who also called for president Biden to be denied the Sacrament. This is not your job, dude! It is not up to you to make that decision!” Someone inform this horrifically ignorant individual that this is the MOST IMPORTANT JOB of Archbishop Cordileone: namely, the shepherding and protecting of each soul for which he is canonically responsible, from eternal damnation.

There is an unprecedented shortage of baby formula across US states, although it has been reported that hoards of baby formula are being stored at the US/Mexico border. We have photos provided by Border Control agents, which testify to this outrageously offensive act: the White House is literally sending baby formula to illegal foreign nationals in the process of breaking American laws, whilst American mothers are driving for hours to attempt to find some formula for their own babies.

Less than 48 hours after Elon Musk, African American, came out as a Republican, he has been ‘me-tooed’, as the usual suspects are accusing him of sexual offences. Rather curious, considering that Musk has been in the public eye since the end of the 1990’s, and has been prominent in public life for almost twenty years. But just 24 hours after he declared to be Republican oriented, a notorious member of the establishment media, Business Insider, ran a piece about Musk allegedly propositioning a masseuse. More than six years after the alleged episode, at the very moment that Musk is in the midst of a hostile takeover of a major speech platform, on an explicitly anti-leftist platform. If the allegations were legitimate, they would have come out long ago, but when such allegations emerge during heating moments in political history, they have always been proven to be cynically motivated accusations maneuvered to block the success of determined individuals (think: Clarence Thomas, Brett Cavanaugh).  Curious fact about this allegation: the day after this article was published, there was an opportunity for a big investor to bet against the Tesla share price, in the hope of Tesla shares lowering after this revelation. Potentially allowing those anticipating this temporary decrease in share value to earn a lot of money. It gets even crazier, because the CEO of business Insider has been accused of securities fraud and is supposedly barred from the industry.

This Past Week in Feminism’s most Sacred of Sacraments

At its most imperiled moment, the proabortion movement sent its supposedly best and brightest last week to Capitol Hill to defend the revolting, horrifying practice of murdering babies, and it turns out that their best are not particularly bright.

Rep. Mike Johnson: “So abortion should be allowed for any reason, for any purpose, at any stage.”

Aimee Arambidhe “I trust people to make decisions about their body. When relevant, I think they need to consult their medical practitioners, and not Congress”.

M.Johnson: Ok, so you would say that it is morally wrong to take the life of a 10-year-old child, correct?

Aimee Arambidhe: I believe so . . .

M.Johnson: And a two-year-old child, well that would be murder, and I think we can agree that that’s wrong. . .Then what is the distinction between the human being who is two years old, or nine months old, or one week old, or an hour old, then one that is eight inches further up the birth canal, what is the difference? Why is it acceptable in the latter cases and not the former cases?

Aimee Arambidhe: “I trust people to determine what to do with their own bodies. Full stop”.

That is the non-answer of a professional abortion activist. This woman has a degree in philosophy, she has graduated from law school, she has worked her entire professional career in the abortion industry, specifically in public affairs, defending abortion. And when she is confronted by the most basic objection concerning abortion, the best defense she can muster is “I trust people to use their bodies”. Embarrassing. But not surprising, considering she is defending the indefensible. (Especially, when you consider AOC and her degree in Economics, and the fact that she is challenged by grade 4 math, you realize that perhaps the US is simply handing out these degrees to the highest bidders, regardless of competence).

It is saddening to consider that there are some people who spend their entire lives defending infanticide, but is also shocking that it seems that no number of university degrees compensate for an obvious lack of intelligence.

Yshika Robinson, abortionist, was asked by Mike Robinson when a baby becomes human, and her response reflects the highest level of philosophical sophistication the abortion industry is capable of mustering.

M.Johnson.:”How does one qualify as fully human? What makes a human being?

Yashika Robinson: “What makes a person a human being is being born, number one . . . that’s why we have birthdays” . . .

Birthdays, we should note, are celebrated in commemoration of the day of one’s birth, not the day one became a human . . .And what of the fact that to a certain extent, birthdays can be fungible? At times, babies are born earlier or later, some births require induction, others require caesarian incision. Ms. Robinson is literally stating that there are two different ontological realities, on either end of the birth canal. And if one is born by c-section, and has not had the opportunity to pass through the magic birth canal, is he or she not human? Just ridiculous stuff.

Here’s another preposterous argument, from El Norte Recuerda, PhD, on twitter:

“The majority of people who get abortions are white. Overturning Roe vs wade neutralizes two major threats to white supremacy.: the declining birth rate and the shrinking white majority. Criminalize abortion, ensure a future majority white working class.”

Info graphic:

Us abortion patients: 39%White, 28%Black, 25% Hispanic, 6% Asian, 3%other; Income: 75% poor or low income; Religion: 62% religiously affiliated, family Size 59% already have a child Age. 60% are in their twenties (Only 12% are teens, of which 4% are minors).

But the info graphic disproves the claims of this brilliant PhD, who apparently does not understand the concept of majority (50+1). The plurality of abortions is amongst the white population, but that is also because 62% of the country is white. Only 13% of the country is black, and roughly 18% of the country is Hispanic, which signifies that there are disproportionately more abortions in the Black and Hispanic population, but especially the Black population. Conclusion. if Roe vs Wade were to be overturned, it would signify that there will be disproportionately more Black and Hispanic babies, and it will have Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood, turning in her grave. So much for that argument.  If these are their best and brightest, we have already won the war.

World

These international economic disasters mentioned earlier are not a bug, but rather a feature of the programs of our elites. They claim a transition is taking place, and therefore prices of oil and food are high in order to guarantee this transition, apparently with the approval of Mr. Global. Consider that our ideological, idiot ruling class, in its moments of unintentional transparency, claims that rising prices of oil are good, and that this is precisely what they desire, in order to promote their ‘Green’ agenda, which is anything but green, forcing us into using unstable solar and wind energy, whilst travelling by electrical cars, nibbling on grasshoppers and slugs.

This is what they have in mind for us, and if we allow them to maintain this power, our global future will look terribly bleak.

WEF is a cartoonishly villainous gathering of world leaders, conspiring behind locked doors. It’s not just government leaders, the corporate leaders, not just the NGO leaders: it is all of them together, and they are all participating in an insider trading fraud circus backed by Schwab, at the expense of the little people. No wonder they won’t allow independent journalists into Davos, if they are not willing to be frisked by the WEF police. (Yes, they have their own police force, complete with cute little badges).

Here’s Klaus Schwab on day 1: “The future is not just happening; the future is being built by us! By a powerful community, as you here in this room. We have the means to improve the state of the world, but first two conditions are necessary: the first, that we act all as stakeholders of larger communities, that we serve not only our self-interests, but also that of the community. That is what we call stakeholder (aka: me and my friends) responsibility. And second, that we collaborate. This is the reason why you find opportunities here during the meeting to engage, and to vary action-oriented initiatives about progress related to specific issues on the global agenda”.

Here is Australian Safety Commissioner Imran Grant, On Free Speech: “We are finding ourselves in a place, where we have increasing polarization, everything feels binary when it doesn’t need to be, so I think we going to have to think about a recalibration of a whole range of human rights that are playing out in real time, from the freedom of speech to the freedom from online violence, or the right of data protection, or the right to CHILD dignity”. Shall we remind them that THEY did not invent free speech, and no one has given them the power to recalibrate it?

CEO of Pfizer Albert Bourla, in response to a question on medical compliance: “How are you thinking about technology that will engage the patient?” “FDA approved the first electronic pill. it is basically a biological chip that is in the tablet, and once you take the tablet and it dissolves into your stomach, it sends a signal that you took the tablet. So, imagine the applications of that, the compliance. The insurance company needs to know that the medicines that the patients should take, they take. It is fascinating what happens in this field. Imagine the compliance!”

President of Ali Baba, Jay Michael Evans, on carbon footprint TRACKING: “We’re developing, through technology, an ability for consumers to measure their own carbon footprint: where are they travelling, how are they travelling, what are they eating, what are they consuming on the platform? Individual carbon footprint tracker, not yet operational, but stay tuned . . .”

Get ready for lashings and imprisonment as punishment for the secular sins committed against Pachamama! The irony of this is that the WEF groupies caused more air pollution with the jet fuel of their countless private jets, which expend more carbon in one hour than the average individual does in a year. And yet another layer of irony: Ali Baba is a Chinese company, and as we all know, China emits more carbon emissions than all countries in the Industrialized World put together.

If you find the speech and behaviour of the members of this forum to be disturbing, you are not alone. Once more, I insist:  if we allow them to maintain this power, our global future is destined to be appallingly bleak. 

Stay tuned for updates on Italy and the EU.

Although we are still reeling from Will Smith’s violent explosion of pent-up masculine frustration the very evening he recieved his historic Oscar, the Depp-Heard Defamation Trial provides us with yet another opportunity to shed light upon some little-known statistics regarding domestic abuse.

It is to be desired that Johnny Depp’s defamation trial inaugurate the beginning of a conversation about men’s rights: will the publicity of this trial open people’s eyes to the struggles of so many men currently suffering in relationships with domineering and abusive women? As parents, we should also ask ourselves how our children – and in particular, our daughters – are being raised, and how the establishment media and our educational systems are influencing their forma mentis; on the one hand, reenforcing the stereotypes of ‘male as instinctively violent’ and ‘female as victim’, whilst on the other hand encouraging girls and young women to hit, scratch, bite and even kick boys in the testicles (risking permanent bodily harm). These are physically abusive actions which young girls and women carry off with impunity: abusive, I insist, because girls are aware that they can mistreat boys without fear of boys responding in kind, as boys are genetically wired to protect the female. Boys have also been made keenly aware (through (re)education and billboards depicting abused women) that any retalation – any response IN KIND to the physical provocations of a girl – would lead to their suspention from school, and at a later stage, their potential arrests.

Everything about the current state of affairs points to a lose-lose scenario for humankind. Males resolve conflict between themselves though physical agression, but it is insanity to encourage girls -decidedly the weaker of the two sexes – to resolve conflict in this manner,: especially with boys. From the commencement of their scholastic careers in educational systems geared against them, in which their boisterousness may lead to labels such as ADDS (resulting in state-ratified drugging), or detentions, failing grades and plummeting self-esteem, to young adulthood, boys live like a subjugated population, so is it any wonder that over 40% of young men insist that they have no intention of marrying?

Before delving into the Depp- Heard trial, let’s look at some statistics regarding domestic violence, shall we?

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE FACTS: According to HHS, women are more likely than men to be domestic abusers. In the year 2020, there were 248,335 reported cases of domestic violence involving a female perpetrator, and 225,020 involving a male perpetrator.

We are all familiar with the phenomenon of courts almost automatically giving custody to mothers, in the case of familial separation. And yet, HHS statistics indicate that single mothers are more likely to be abusive than single fathers. In 2020, there were 221,372 reported cases of child abuse involving only the mother, whereas there were 138,803 instances involving only the father. This is not reflected in the custody system, indicating that courts bear an unjust bias towards men, without any legitimate supporting motivations, whist paradoxically favouring the individuals who are proportionately more abusive.

Lesbian couples have the highest domestic abuse rate of any demographic. According to the National Coalition of Domestic Violence, “43.8% of lesbian women and 61.1% of bisexual women have experienced rape, physical violence, and/or stalking by an intimate partner”; these statistics are outrageously disproportionate, compared to  gay couples, making gay couples the least likely perpetrators of domestic violence, while heterosexual couples remain midstream, and lesbian couples, statistically the most likely. The common denominator between the latter two categories is ….women. Link to article:NCADV. (In fact, Amber Heard has a history of domestic violence, as she had been previously arrested for assaulting her ex-wife in an airport, and had spent a night in jail for this crime).

Let’s return to Johnny Depp vs. Amber Heard:

Last Thursday marked the seventh day of hearings in Johnny Depp’s defamation trial against Amber Heard, and up to this moment, much of Johnny’s testimony has revealed some shocking details about his ex-wife’s behavior, (See:YouTube), including her leaving her excrement in their bed after an arguement during which she had repeatedly hit him.

In May of 2016, after less than a year of marriage, Amber Heard filed for divorce, claiming that Johnny Depp was physically abusive, which Depp vehemently denied (Insider). In August of 2016, a divorce settlement was reached out of court, providing Heard with 7 million dollars, which she claimed would be donated to the ACLU and the LA Chidren’s Hospital (Insider). (A claim which has failed to manifest in reality, as there is no trace of her donating any of the money) SCMP.

In December of 2018, Heard wrote a piece for the Washington Post WaPo in which she stated : “I spoke up against sexual violence — and faced our culture’s wrath. That has to change.” And although Heard and her lawyers claim that Depp’s name was never mentioned in the article, within it she states: “Then two years ago, I became a public figure representing domestic abuse, and I felt the full force of our culture’s wrath for women who speak out”, directly insinuating Depp’s guilt. Depp was dropped from the Disney Pirates of the Caribbean franchise within days of the article’s release, leading to the current $50 million defamation trial.

Here are some of the facts which have been revealed, together with pertinent internet links. The first audio is of Heard mocking Depp, stating that no one will believe him (YouTube), and in the second Heard admits that she hit Johnny repeatedly (Twitter), whilst doctor’s testimony reveals that both she admitted that she had punched Johnny, and that Johnny had privately revealed that his nose injury had not been caused by an ‘accordion door’. Bear in mind that if a man were to behave in the manner in which this woman behaved, he would be considered a monster. And as I mentioned earlier: between men, someone behaving like this would be punched back. But the current state of affairs for men is thus: if you respond to the instigation of your female partner, you are an abuser; if you don’t respond, you are a weakling, a baby, a p***y, as Heard so eloquently states.

Evidence and testimony presented at the trial also show an important finger injury Depp suffered at the hands of Heard when she smashed a bottle against him. In case you think he’s exaggerating, we’ve provided pictures of a cut to the bone, for which he also suffered Staff infection. (Twitter, Twitter). (Depp had originally claimed – rather gallantly – that he had injured himself).

What we do know is that due to Heard’s allegations, the damage is done: Depp’s career has been ruined (Twitter). We may also observe that the establishment media is STILL attempting to frame Depp as a wife beater Variety, because they apparently have recieved marching orders to do so. And finally, we are left with an uncanny conviction that this particular marriage was nothing more than a ploy to acquire Depp’s money, and that false accusations such as those of Amber Heard delegitimize the true victims of spousal abuse, making it more difficult to discern truth from falsehood and pecuniary motivations.

Why is this not the biggest story in the Country? Why has this horrific news not spread to other Nations? How is this barberism ‘empowering’ to women?

By Sam Dorman | April 1, 2022 , 03:39pm

WARNING: This article contains disturbing images.

4/1/22: Physician experts have told Live Action News that five aborted children recovered from a D.C. abortion facility appear to have been old enough to survive outside the womb, raising questions about potential legal and serious ethical violations by the abortion facility. 

Dr. Robin Pierucci, a neonatal specialist, told Live Action News: “I can say with confidence that [four of] these babies died at an age when they were viable, premature people.” In her Friday morning comments, she noted that she was going to work in a NICU where she would “care for little ones this size and age.”

During a Thursday press conference, D.C. police quickly dismissed the possibility that the babies experienced illegal abortions but declined to comment further when asked by Live Action News. Although D.C. doesn’t ban late-term abortions, medical professionals are still bound by federal laws which restrict the method of abortion and require life-saving care for infants born after botched procedures.

Lifesaving care is something Dr. Cesare Santangelo, who operates the facility where the discarded babies were discovered, has already said repeatedly that he either doesn’t provide or avoids.

A pro-life activist voluntarily informed the D.C. homicide unit of the babies and surrendered them to authorities. Details are forthcoming but the Progressive Anti-Abortion Uprising (PAAU) group, to which this activist belongs, believes the “late gestational ages as well as their apparent sustained injuries potentially show violations of the Partial Birth Abortion Act as well as the Born Alive Infants Protection Act.” The group also announced that a funeral mass and naming ceremony was offered for the babies.

Live Action president and founder Lila Rose said in response,  “The discovery of these bodies is horrific and disturbing evidence of the infanticide that may be occurring in this clinic within our nations’ capital, and indicative of the violence happening in abortion facilities nationwide.”

Baby boy #1 ‘should have been in a nursery’

Perhaps the largest and most developed baby found was a boy, whose gestational age has been estimated to be around 28-32 weeks – well within the third trimester, past the point at which the majority of experts agree that preborn babies can feel pain, and beyond the point many states have restricted abortions for medical and ethical reasons. For example, the Mississippi law that recently came before the Supreme Court limits abortion to just 15 weeks based on concerns surrounding fetal development, pain, and other factors.

Photos and video of the first baby boy reveal that he remained largely intact, raising questions about how his life ended. He also has what appears to be a fully formed face, fingers, toes, and all the primary features normally visible in a newborn. 

Baby boy #1 – D.C.

Dr. Kathi Aultman, a former abortionist who later became pro-life, told Live Action News that he “appears to be in the 3rd trimester near term and looks like he should have been in the nursery.” Dr. Patti Giebink similarly said via email that this baby boy “looks close to term gestation … [a]nd pretty much intact,” adding that she couldn’t “believe they would abort a nearly full term baby unless there was something terminally wrong with the baby, but it doesn’t appear so.”

“He is totally intact, but his skin is somewhat macerated,” Aultman said. “In other words, it has begun to degenerate, which would indicate that he was probably dead when he was aborted, or he was not well preserved, and his tissues began to deteriorate after the abortion. He appears to be completely normal and was probably aborted using the induction method, which uses medication to induce labor. He looks about the same size as my granddaughter when she was born.”

Two neonatologists – Dr. Kendra Kolb and Dr. Robin Pierucci – similarly expressed shock at the state of this baby’s body. Kolb estimated a gestational age as late as 32 weeks while medical advances are continually pushing back the age of viability. At the end of last year, a baby in Alabama, Curtis Means, was born at 21 weeks, which comes just after the 20-week cutoff that the U.S. senate rejected in 2018.

The National Library of Medicine says that at 32 weeks, the baby has lungs, a beating heart, and other major organs. He or she also has the ability to hear, a rapidly growing brain, a nervous system “developed enough to control some body functions,” eyelids that can open and close, and “surfactant” or a substance that helps the lungs’ air sacs fill with air.

READ: Contrary to popular belief, late-term abortions aren’t always done for medical reasons

Kolb told Live Action News that “it is beyond horrific and devastating for me as a Neonatologist to see these images, as these babies are representative of the very same patient population that I care for.  To then see these discarded aborted babies, and even try to imagine what they went through during these horrific abortion procedures is infuriating and devastating beyond words.”

“Even if all of these babies were aborted ‘legally’, it is without question and crystal clear to see that this practice is neither ethical nor empowering to women. This is the American horror story that we call ‘choice’ on full display for all to see.”

“Baby Girl #1” may have experienced an illegal partial birth abortion

Many of the babies’ bodies showed deep lacerations or other forms of damage that likely resulted from abortion procedures inflicting significant trauma with deep pain prior to their deaths.

One of the baby girls could be seen with her right eye open, significant damage to her head, and with the rest of her body relatively intact. Footage shows her curled in the fetal position with pinkish-tan skin as her lifeless, half-open eye looks into the distance.

Baby girl #1 – D.C.

Baby girl #1 (side view)- D.C.

According to Kolb, that baby appeared to be at 28-30 weeks at the time of her likely abortion. “This baby appears to be somewhere between 28-30 weeks gestational age, with evidence of deep lacerations to the posterior neck which presumably correlates to the method of abortion used to end her life,” said Kolb. 

NLM notes that at that point, “all parts of the baby’s eyes are developed,” “footprints and fingerprints are forming,” and “your baby may startle in response to loud noises.” And doctors have acknowledged that the baby can feel pain at this stage. One abortionist previously told Fox News that at 23 weeks, babies start developing the thalamocortical fibers for processing pain. 

The prevailing timeline of pain at 24 weeks, however, has been questioned by Dr. Stuart Derbyshire, who previously called fetal pain a “misnomer.” Derbyshire recently published an article in which he suggested babies could actually feel pain as early as 12 weeks. 

Citing a literature review, the Charlotte Lozier Institute says that research indicates “neural connections from periphery to brain are functionally complete after 18 weeks.”

It’s difficult to tell how this baby girl ultimately died, but Aultman noted that if she was alive at the start of the procedure, the abortionist would have committed an illegal partial birth abortion in which the baby is partially delivered before a doctor ends his or her life.

“Baby girl # 2” likely endured an ‘unimaginably brutal procedure’

Not all of the other babies were intact. In fact, many first trimester babies were obtained with their bodies and internal organs in pieces.

One of the later-term baby girls was also found in pieces. Footage shows her detached arm along with her legs attached to her torso. The flesh appears darkened due to apparent decay and her head seemed to be flattened.

Baby girl dismembered – D.C.

Kolb told Live Action News that this baby girl appeared to have endured a dilation and evacuation (D&E) abortion, which typically entails tearing a baby to pieces before crushing the child’s skull with a medical instrument. 

“Although difficult to say with exact precision, this baby may have been somewhere between 26-28 weeks gestational age at the time a Dilation and Evacuation (or “D&E”) dismemberment abortion was done to end her life,” said Kolb. 

“She has evidence of both dismemberment of her upper extremity, decapitation, and organ evisceration as the result of this unimaginably brutal procedure.” A slew of other babies were found with organs like their intestines and lungs exposed, as well as bodies apparently contorted or shredded in abortions.

“Baby X” was found in its amniotic sac and could have been born alive

Besides D&E, abortionists may induce labor after injecting the baby with feticide like digoxin. While it’s unclear what (if any) chemical agents these babies may have received, one of them shows signs of induction and potential life outside of the womb. 

Photos and video footage shows what’s considered a well-developed baby in the fetal position and encased by his or her amniotic sac. Viewers can also see a foot that’s still pink and a hand with veins that presumably became markedly blue due to lack of oxygen.

La candidata del Presidente degli USA Joe Biden alla sostituzione del giudice della Corte Suprema Stephen Breyer, nei tre giorni della sua audizione avanti ai senatori del Judiciary Committee -chiamato a confermare la sua nomina-  ha a) rifiutato di dichiarare quando inizia una vita; b rifiutato di dare la definizione di “donna”; c) difeso la sua serie di verdetti indulgenti contro crimini odiosi come la pedofilia e la pubblicazione o il possesso di pedopornografia; d) ha esplicitamente espresso simpatia per i Black Israelites, un movimento razzista e antisemita; e) si èrivelata essere sostenitrice della Critical Race Theory, delle c.d. Progetto 1618, e dell’associazione Black Lives Matter. Vi sono due possibilità: o si tratta di un “equity hire” di incredibile incompetenza, o è la candidata più radicale della storia della Corte Suprema degli Stati Uniti. Tuttavia il suo disinvolto rifiuto di rispondere a pertinenti domande di rilevanza politica e culturale è risultato sgradito al pubblico generale, ragion per cui i senatori Democratici stanno tentando di arginare il fiume di pura ideologia esposto dalla candidata.

Durante una serie di domande del senatore Repubblicano Ted Cruz, il quale ha spiegato come le condanne assegnate ai pedofili da Katanji Jackson fossero significativamente inferiori alle condanne standard determinate dal governo, il senatore Dick Durbin non ha permesso alla candidata di rispondere, interrompendo ripetutamente sia Cruz che Jackson. Non vi era mai stato prima un caso in cui un chairman non avesse permesso una risposta da parte di un candidato giudiziario.

Il seguente video, diventato subito virale, dimostra chiaramente come sia il senatore Durbin a impedire una risposta da parte della candidata, mentre è il senatore Cruz a insistere nell’esigere una risposta:

Considerato che Biden aveva preannunciato che la sua scelta per la candidatura sarebbe stata una donna di colore – escludendo quindi il 94% della popolazione degli Stati Uniti – risulta ironico il fatto che la stessa candidata non abbia voluto definire la parola “donna”.

“Non posso dare una definizione di donna. Non sono una biologa.” Questa dichiarazione mostra come la questione del gender sia diventata uno dei principali problemi culturali della modernità, grazie a cui possiamo osservare come quello che era un tempo lo sport femminile sia diventato un tragico campo di battaglia, o come sia ormai permesso l’accesso ai bagni femminili da parte di uomini adulti, spesso malintenzionati. A questa DONNA tuttavia è palesemente stato ordinato di evitare certi temi, tanto cari ai radicali di sinistra, nonostante i suoi cromosomi XX siano una sua caratteristica immutabile.

Durante l’esposizione del contenuto di alcune sue sentenze, Katanji Jackson ha caldamente lodato il culto radicale dei “African Hebrew Israelites”, dichiarando che non si tratta solo di una comunità religiosa ma piuttosto di un movimento culturale che promuove il veganismo e uno stile di vita sano. Ciò non corrisponde alla realtà di questo gruppo di nazionalisti neri, che ritengono che non siano gli Ebrei i veri Israeliti, ma che il vero Popolo di Dio descritto nella Bibbia sia l’insieme delle persone di colore. Membri di questo culto sono spesso stati colti, e registrati via video, a New York o D.C, intenti a scagliare epiteti razzisti e antisemitici ai passanti, spesso insieme a insulti sessisti, e sono stati immortalati in numerosi video in cui attaccavano e insultavano i ragazzi di Covington presenti alla Marcia per la Vita del 2020.  E’ quantomeno singolare che un futuro membro della Corte Suprema fornisca un convinto elogio di una comunità tanto bizzarra e controversa, dichiarando che non sia un’organizzazione di carattere religioso, benché questa comunità dichiari nella propria homepage di avere natura religiosa, e di rappresentare i veri Israeliti, scacciati dalla Terra Promessa. Possibile che Katanji Jackson sia completamente ignorante riguardo ai casi che ha affrontato da giudice? O sta mentendo?

Quella che però è forse l’evidenza più schiacciante a sfavore di questa candidata rimane il suo pessimo track record di condanne troppo leggere contro pedofili e possessori di pedopornografia, che riflette la tendenza che hanno molti progressisti radicali ad essere troppo clementi, per volere del loro sponsor George Soros. Katanji Jackson è caduta in un’astuta trappola, che l’ha portata ad esporsi in un’apologia di quella che lei descrive come una sottocategoria di “devianti sessuali infrequenti”, sostenendo che un individuo può, attraverso Internet, una sola volta o occasionalmente, “accidentalmente” scaricare migliaia di immagini, e dover comunque scontare una lunga condanna (il che non era tra l’altro illustrativo di alcuno dei casi da lei affrontati); al che il senatore Lindsey Graham ha risposto: “Bene! Spero che chiunque cerchi su Internet immagini di minorenni in circostanze di sfruttamento sessuale venga condannato a 50 anni di carcere!” Non vuole che i colpevoli di pedopornografia vengano condannati a un lungo periodo di detenzione? A quanto pare no.

Questo perché la Jackson è chiaramente imbevuta dell’ideologia della sinistra radicale, e di conseguenza crede che i delinquenti dovrebbero ricevere condanne molto più miti, che vi è un problema di eccessivo uso della carcerazione, che urge una riforma in tal senso della giustizia, che il vero colpevole è la società, eccetera… e poco importa se questo gioverà anche agli autori di alcuni fra i più orribili delitti.

Rebecca De Broglie

Traduzione Giambattista Vannicelli